Sunday, May 3, 2009

English Department to Host Gothic Social Event

The University of the Cumberlands' English and Modern Foreign Language Department is hosting a "Gothic Gala" for all of its English majors and minors. Although the party is designed for the British Gothic Tradition class (currently taught by Dr. Gina Herring), the invitation has been extended to all English majors and minors as well as all lovers of Gothic literature and culture.

The "gala" will be held April 30 in the foyer of the Grace Crum Rollins Center at 7:00 p.m. There will be refreshments and an opportunity for attendees to costume as elaborately or minimally as they choose. Dr. Herring has issued the following invitation:

"Enjoy Gothic glamour, fiendish feasting, and cryptic conversation in an atmosphere of eerie elegance and spine-tingling splendor unsurpassed this side of Transylvania! Please join us for a horrific evening of frightful frivolity!

The novels (or musicals) from which the Gala will draw its inspirations are the same as those studied in the British Gothic Tradition class: Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights, Robert Louis Stevenson's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Henry James' Turn of the Screw, Bram Stoker's Dracula, and Daphne DuMaurier's Rebecca to name a few. The decorations and refreshments will be influenced by the works, and the guests are encouraged to costume to the same effect.

Each spring, the English and Modern Foriegn Language Department hosts one or more literature-themed events. Last year, the department hosted a Victorian picnic, a birthday party for Shakespeare, and a Regency-style tea party in honor of Jane Austen. This year, the department is hosting an unprecedented social event: a celebration of the dark side.

For more information about the majors, minors, and individual courses offered by the English and Modern Foriegn Language Department, visit the deparment's website.

UC Professor Opens a "Window"

What if all writing were looked at as a window into the soul of the author? It would certainly change the perspective of the college student working late in the night to meet the minimum requirement assigned for a research paper.

Students often spend countless hours in front of their computers, typing away bits of their soul, and pouring morsels of themselves ontothe page. A teacher then inspects the work line by line, making sure it is structurally and logically sound. This transaction is mostly just a formal exchange of ideas and nothing personal.

Nancy Jensen, an Associate Professor of English at University of the Cumberlands, knows a lot about this transactive writing. She also knows about a window into one’s soul. In fact, she had one published.

On Jan. 25, Jensen’s book, entitled Window, was released in a soft cover, 160-page edition, the cover of which depicts a young woman dressed in white, looking out a full-length window into a blurry, indiscernible vista. The likeness of the girl can be seen in the open window, mirroring her reflective stance.

The cover illustrates the stories within, all of which provide insight into Jensen’s mind. Jensen’s editor, Sena Jeter Naslund (who is editor of Fleur-de-Lis Press and has had several works of fiction published nationally), describes eloquently the vista that is in store for the reader:

“Nancy Jensen’s stories and essays allow readers to see into the rooms of her mind. Flung wide open, these pieces even serve as doors through which we can step inside, turn, and look out with the author at previously unviewed vistas. Whether looking inward or outward, Jensen’s prose always illumines.”

Window has been hailed by Dianne Aprile, author of Making A Heart for God: A Week Inside a Catholic Monastery, as a book that “blends the self-examining voice of the personal essay with the scalpel-like precision of the modern short essay.”

This is an accurate description of the book, which is written in two sections; the first section contains five short stories, and the second section holds five insightful, panoramic views into Jensen’s personal experience. The effect is a collection that “illuminates the common tradition of storytelling that informs fiction and nonfiction alike,” according to Aprile.

The praise for Jensen’s expert combination of story and essay continues with Sydney Lea, author of Ghost Pain and Pursuit of a Wound, who congratulates Jensen’s “essays with the lyricism of the best fiction, fiction with the inquisitiveness of the best essays.”

Jensen shares her expertise in her craft with writing students at University of the Cumberlands. In the biography provided by the publishers of Window, Jensen is credited with developing and implementing “a highly successful mentoring model for courses in the undergraduate creative writing program.”

In fact, several of Jensen’s students here at University of the Cumberlands have been published in national literary journals and have gone on to study in graduate writing programs. Students in Jensen’s classes often remark on the astounding amount of criticism and advice
awarded them about their creative writing.

For aspiring writers, this indefatigable dedication to the art of writing and Jensen’s proven skill in her art make her the perfect source from which to draw invaluable knowledge in the how-to’s of writing.

Asked when she decided that she was a writer, Jensen replied: “I can hardly remember when it wasn’t that way. My grandmother taught me to write when I was three…it was in late elementary when I started thinking about it seriously.”

This is Jensen’s first book. In fact, her publisher, Fluer-de-Lis Press, only publishes first books. Furthermore, it only publishes works by authors who have been published in the Louisville Review, which is the sister publication to Fleur-de-Lis.

Jensen began writing the essays in 2003 and 2004, but it was Jensen’s publisher who tapped on Jensen’s window by approaching her about making a compilation of essays and stories.

When asked about the initial idea to compile the works into a book, Jensen comments that “the editor of the press approached me about a mixed genre collection because she wanted to do something different.”

The book nearly didn’t come to fruition at all: “At first I resisted because it wasn’t cohesive, but in the end I found that there were thematic connections.” The stories and essays in Window were written over six years ago, but the actual publishing process for the book took a little over two years.

Jensen
described the publication process: “The longest span of time was spent waiting until the press was ready. I presented the final manuscript in January 2008 and it was sent to press in September.”

The actual release date was pushed to Jan. 2009. “We delayed the actual release date so that the book could be new for an entire year,” Jensen chuckled.

One of the striking features of the book, especially in essays, is the remarkable candor and honesty that Jensen provides the reader. It is a fairly generous insight into Jensen’s experience. Her detailed account of her failed marriages, for example, provides a clear view into her painful past.

When asked whether there was a time when she felt too exposed or vulnerable, Jensen remarked: “Putting essays into book form suggests a wider readership. Of course there is the fact that my friends and family will read it, but for the most part it is an audience that I’ll never see or know. I started writing the essays in 2003 and 2004 and made peace with it then. As far as vulnerability, I was over it years ago and worked through a lot during the writing process.”

The essays are, of course, non-fiction. But what about the stories?

“Certainly fiction is born of seeds from my life, but non are directly biographical. The underlying feelings are,” Jensen explained.

Praise for Window has not been in short supply. Neither has it been scare for Jensen herself. Author Richard Goodman wrote that “Window is written with fire and ice by a courageous, brilliant writer…Her writing is brave, and graceful, and deeply affecting.”

Jensen’s first book has opened a window for the reader, but it has also opened doors for Jensen as a writer. Jensen’s closing statement is one of future plans: “Of course the goal is to continue writing books. I just hope someone will want to publish them.”

Jensen who received outstanding feedback for Window, has nearly completed another pane, this time a novel.

Know1ng When to Quit


Knowing, or Know1ng as it's called in its promotional title, is a cerebral thriller that is never lacking in twists, turns, and surprises. As a member of the thriller family, it isn't an exceptional movie. Children hear voices, planes fall from the sky, creepy men in black trench coats drive around in an old car handing people strange objects.

The movie can, however, lay claim to a truly exceptional ending in that it will leave viewers talking about it... perhaps not in a good way. I left the cinema feeling that I had been cheated in some way. I turned to my fellow moviegoers, and all I could say was, "Really? I mean...really?" My experience with this movie is not a unique example. As the credits rolled, the man behind me said, "The director must have been on crack when he wrote that ending."

The director may have also been in this state when he decided to cast Nicholas Cage as the leading man. Director and producer Alex Proyas, who has directed 15 films (including his only well-known movie, I Robot), displayed either brilliant or mediocre casting.






Cage's performance in the movie is startlingly similar to his roles in the National Treasure movies. Instead of searching for buried treasure in an Indiana Jones-esque way, he is trying to save the world. Instead of following clues about United States history that no man could possibly know, he is following a set of numbers.

As the movie opens (in the 1950's), a time capsule is buried at a school. It contains a letter writen by each student about their views of the future. Most kids draw pictures. One child writes an entire page of nonstop numbers. Fifty years later, when the capsule is opened, a father, Nicholas Cage, takes his son to the commemorative unburying of the capsule. The son, of course, ends up with the numbers. Nicholas Cage, of course, cracks the code.

Knowing has haunted me for several weeks after viewing it, and I wouldn't consider myself one of the faint of heart. But it wasn't the intense action, the doomsday images, the creepy children who hear voices, or Nicholas Cage's ghost of a repeat perforamce that sent chills down my spine.

There is a nameless character, only referred to as The Stranger in the credits, who constantly appears throughout the movie. Who he actually is is up for debate (refer to comments above concerning the ending of the movie). He is played by D.G. Maloney and was cast, I'm convinced, only because he is the scariest human being alive.

I'm not sure what disturbed me more: his role in the movie or the fact that there really is someone out there who looks that creepy. Maloney has appeared in only one other movie: Eternity Man. Where Proyas failed in his casting of Cage, he excelled in his casting of Maloney. Well done, Mr. Proyas, and bravo. We're all officially scared.

As for Cage's performance, it would certainly win an Oscar were there a category called "Best Harrison Ford Imitation." However, it isn't Cage's mediocre performance that will have audiences chattering: sorry, Nicholas Cage, but you've been outshined by a scary minor character and some kids who hear voices.